Iowa Has Their Priorities Straight

It is a sad day when Iowa is recognizing gay marriage and California is going backwards. Today, the Iowa state supreme court nullified a state law that forbid gay marriage. 

From the DesMoines Register:

"The Iowa Supreme Court this morning upheld a Polk County judge’s 2007 ruling that marriage should not be limited to one man and one woman."

Wow, I wish us Californians could catch up with Iowa!

Republicans Calling for Newly Elected Senator Begich to Resign

The repubs are shameless. They consistently sink to new lows. They are now asking, ney, demanding for Begich to resign. Why? Because the election he won was tainted. Now that Holder let former Alaska Senator Stevenson off the hook (which he was guilty of) they are saying Begich didn't win fairly.

What a sad sorry state of affairs when repubs don't like the results and demand the winner, who's a dem, to resign. 

New lows. 

Dodd Not Doing Well

Dem Senator Chris Dodd is having major problems. Big enough to get him ousted in his reelection in 2010.  His poll numbers might get him to be asked to step aside.

From Politicalwire:

"Devastating poll numbers this morning should increase the pressure on Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT) to consider retirement so a safe Democratic seat doesn't turn into a Republican one."

Obama's Awesome First Day

From MSNBC:

"In just a few hours yesterday, President Obama completed the equivalent of a diplomatic decathlon -- from pledging nuclear disarmament with the Russians, to facing down critics about the American economic way of life. It was a week's worth of international diplomacy packed into 12 hours, and he’s back at it again today. Already, Obama has met with Korean leaders, participated in G-20 breakfast, took a G-20 class photo, attended a plenary session, and attended a G-20 leaders lunch. "

Pretty good for his first day. 

Ted Stevens Dodges a Huge Bullit

Former Alaska Senator Ted Stevens dodged a bullet yesterday when attorney general Eric Holder filed to discontinue the prosecution of Ted, even after he was convicted. Ted was awaiting sentencing but the new AG is now trying to void his conviction. 

There were three reasons for this. Ted is 85, he lost his senate seat, and there were major errors on the part of the prosecution. Very bad errors from what I saw. The prosecutors on a couple of occasions withheld evidence during disclosure. There were a couple of big items the prosecutors "forgot" to disclose.

At the end of the day, the old man is no longer in power, he lost in disgrace and because of the misconduct of the prosecutors, I like this decision to let him off. 

Obama's Image Still Strong

The AIG fiasco of a couple of weeks ago had several dems worried that the dem/Obama image might take a beating from all the outrage. But it turns out he's doing just fine and with him asking for and getting the resignation of the GM CEO, doesn't hurt his image either. '

Its a twofer. First, he looks like he's taking a hard line on the CEO's who have been getting paid tons on the tax payer dime. Second, the union workers get little angry with him as well. Why is the worker anger a good thing. Obama has to appear balanced between his job and the liberals. He/Biden have been working to get EFCA through and eventually it will get through. But, right now, for the rest of society to see that he's will to stand up to some groups that support him is good for his longterm image.

At the end of the day, the unions will continue to support Obama because he is working for their goals.

The Budget Reconciliation Process

The expression The Budget Reconciliation Process (BRP) has been shot around as a way to get important health care and climate stuff passed. What is BPR?

The meat of it is this:

"Created in a budget resolution in 1974 as part of the congressional budget process...First used in 1980 this process was used at the end of a fiscal year to enact legislation to fine tune revenue and spending levels through legislation that could not be filibustered in the Senate." (emphasis mine)

The point of it is this, whenever passing budget stuff, in order to move the legislation along quickly, 60 votes aren't needed to end debate. It comes up for a straight vote only needing 51 votes to pass.

Why is this important? The dems can use anything that might create revenue or spend money as a way to attach it onto this type of bill. Thus, controversial stuff like health care reform, global warming reform, or anything that deals with money, can be used in this process.

It is a shitty process but for those of you not up to date, the repubs filibuster anything they don't like so that it NEVER gets voted on.

The repubs are up in arms right now saying "This is undemocratic!" But their short term memories only go back about a year because they used this several times to get things passed when they were in charge.

I say go for it and forget about the repubs whining about being left out. The country elected someone else to drive for a while.